Living Wills
A few weeks ago, I read about the ongoing controversy surrounding Dmitri Nabokov's obligation to destroy his father's unpublished manuscript "The Original of Laura." I don't know about any recent developments in the story, but at the time the crux of it was that Vladimir had clearly wanted the manuscript destroyed, and Dmitri felt some obligation to finally do so (he's getting on in years, and he's either going to publish it or burn it, rather than leave the decision to someone else). Again, I don't know what he chose, but there was lots of hand-wringing about it--even though the manuscript amounted to only about thirty pages, scholars shuddered at the thought of losing it simply because of some decades-old dying wishes.
I understand why scholars, and really anyone who likes to read Nabokov, would be upset by the issue. Many people have invoked the famous instructions of Kafka to Max Brod which, had they been followed, would have denied us The Trial. Virgil did the same thing, telling people on his deathbed to burn the Aeneid, and obviously we're all glad that didn't happen. Yet as a writer, the idea that someone might rummage through my unfinished works and share them with other people after I'm dead absolutely horrifies me. Whenever I'm on an airplane, and the thought of fiery death naturally comes upon me, I mostly worry about people reading through all the crappy drafts I have saved on my computer. This is, of course, pretty grandiose thinking--when most writers die, there isn't a public clamoring to see what they left behind. Yet the theoretical possibility of it exists, and it's terrible enough to worry all of us.
I wonder if there's a way to make it legal, a sort of living will for writers--we sign a document that unreservedly asserts that whatever drafts are lingering on the life support system of our Microsoft Word files must be mercifully put to rest in the event of our deaths. I think most writers, myself included, would find it extremely vain to imagine such a thing is necessary, and would argue that we should be grateful for whatever attention we get, alive or dead. Yet I also think most writers would sign such a document. Look at what happened when they pried True At First Light from Hemingway's cold, dead fingers. And while none of us are Hemingway, I still think it would be a comfort to face death knowing most of our literary failures would die with us . There's a lot of awfulness behind the curtain, and I don't want anyone to get a peek.
- Login Or register To Post Comments
- Send To A Friend



Ben Pfeiffer says:
The Mystery of Living Wills
When I was in Boston last weekend, Sarah and I saw a friend perform in a play called The Mystery of Edwin Drood. Apparently it was an unfinished Charles Dickens novel. If he had destroyed it, we would not have the play today (the play's fairly well done, and Erica did terrific as Rosa Bud). And it's immensely interesting as a novel fragment, a mystery, as it would happen, with no end and therefore no solution.
One writer's literary failure might be another reader's, oh, I don't know, treasure, I guess, although that seems sort of cliche. If the writing is no good, people won't read it anyway. And critics, if one is fortunate enough to draw such attention, will always be poking through manuscripts (even literary failures) looking for the name of a writer's first love or first dog, as if it matters. So why not let them?
Everyone needs to pass the time somehow. I think the tendency to want to destroy a manuscript is caught up in showing something before it's finished (and against a writer's will). It's a little like having the dressing room door opened while you're changing, or at least that's how I feel.
-Ben
Ben Pfeiffer says:
Dmitri Nabokov
Hey, I heard on NPR that Dmitri Nabokov is publishing The Original of Laura.