where the writers are

Why the 4th of July Feels Empty This Year


bibliomaniac

10% of profits from sales of Paranoia (a 9/11 survivor's tale) will be donated to the Twin Towers Orphan Fund (www.ttof.org). For more information, visit www.jebraun.com.

Amazon.com

  paperback
Amazon.com

Barnes & Noble

  paperback
Barnes & Noble

Powell's Books

  paperback
Powell's Books
More booksellers coming soon!

July 3, 2009, 10:12 am

Yesterday, I wrote a fairly long blog about why we celebrate Independence Day. I figured it would be my final blog of the week, but when I finished, something didn't feel right. It's sitting in my draft folder now, unused.

It took me some time to figure out just what it was that I wasn't comfortable with. I'd written patriotic blogs before, thanking our veterans and extolling the virtues of the good ol' USA, so why wasn't I comfortable with this blog?

The answer came to me last night when I was watching the township fireworks display with my family. For the first time in my life, I felt the holiday was about the fireworks and the barbecue, and nothing else. It felt...empty.

Don't get me wrong. I thank God for what those rag tag armies and brave farmers did more than 200 years ago. I thank God for every soldier that has sacrificed - or even been willing to sacrifice - his or her life to allow me to write what I'm writing, to allow us to vote, to allow us to pursue the life we want to pursue. But there was this underlying feeling that soon, all that fighting, all those sacrifices were to be in vain.

Each day another liberty is taken from us. With every law that tells you you can't sell your home until a government inspector tells you it meets their GREEN standards (cap and trade), or you can only use so much electricity or be charged a fine, or that you MUST buy healthcare or be fined, or that you can only make so much money, or you can only drive a certain type of car, or you can only own a radio station if you're not presenting views that differ from the President's, we lose liberty. With every international treaty considered, we lose liberty (the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child would allow the courts to tell you how you are allowed to parent your child). With every bill that tells us we MUST volunteer and who we can and can't volunteer for, we lose liberty. With every czar that Obama appoints to make these things happen (we're currently at 28, I believe: TARP, Border, Intelligence, Terrorism, Energy, Urban Affairs, Weapons, Technology, AIDS, Great Lakes, Health, Stimulus Accountability, Faith-based, Pay, Guantanamo Closure, Sudan, Afghanistan, Science, Jobs, Drug, Information, Mideast Peace, Car, Mideast Policy, WMD, Climate, Regulatory, and Economic), we lose liberty. By the way, the new Regulatory Czar believes animals should have the right to sue a person in court - animals should get rights before unborn children do. I'm not a strict Pro-Lifer, but this concept of animals getting rights before unborn human children infuriates me.

The soldiers of the United States have fought and died to provide us a country where we can enjoy inalienable rights - the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Inalienable means given to us by God, a higher being, or just by the very fact of our existence - depending on what it is you believe. Since no man or government has given us these rights, no man or government can take them away. Notice though, it says nowhere that I am guaranteed a home, an education, a car, healthcare, or a check from the government if I choose to do nothing with my life. I am guaranteed the PURSUIT - this means that I need to work to get the things I want. I have no RIGHT to them. And nowhere in the US Constitution does it guarantee us any of those things as man or government-given rights, nor does it give ANYONE the right to TAKE those things FROM me. But somewhere along the line, people came to believe that if somebody produced more than them, they deserved a cut. If somebody earned more than them, they deserved a cut. To me, Ayn Rand hit the nail on the head when she called these people looters. Where would these people be if the producers, the profit makers, went on strike as they do in Atlas Shrugged? They would continue to cannibalize each other until there was nothing left - until everybody was 100% dependent on the government.

And I believe this is the ultimate goal of this administration. Get more and more people dependent on government. The more people dependent on government, the longer the Democrats stay in power. Control industry, destroy the producers, get more people on the government payroll, get more people in unions, provide amnesty to illegal immigrants. Let no man be responsible for himself. Make each person a part of a group - black, gay, poor, immigrant, Hispanic, because as a part of one of these groups you serve as a base of power - realize your own individuality, realize that you can help yourself, and you no longer serve a purpose to them. So they will do whatever they can to keep you from helping yourself and disguise it as if it's for your own good.

So, on this Independence Day, I am praying that things turn around, because as it stands now, I fear we are headed in a terrible direction. The media is supposed to be the watchdog of the U.S. Government. They are supposed to inform the people of what is going on, but they've done little more than stump for Obama and publicly MOCK U.S. citizens for exercising their constitutional right to protest. Sure, some cracks are starting to form (Helen Thomas, who's been covering the White House for the Associated Press since Kennedy's Administration told White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs the other day that no administration has tried to control the media like the Obama Administration - not even Nixon's), but is it too little too late?

So, while I thank the brave men and women who have given us our freedom over the years, I apologize to them, as well, for allowing the government to even get to a point where the IDEA that those sacrifices could have been in vain is a reality. I feel we are on the verge of failing them. I feel we are on the verge of failing our children.

I pray there is time to set this right, but with Obama in the White House, a filibuster-proof House of Representatives, the Dems holding a Super Majority in the Senate, and a media that won't seem to question anything they do, I think we're going to continue to lose liberties. I'd say I can't wait until 2012, or even 2016, but if there isn't a backlash in the 2010 Congressional elections, I have a sinking feeling in 2016, we're going to see President Obama seeking a THIRD term in office and a whole lot of impoverished people dependent on the government dime.

Let freedom ring.

J.E. Braun is the author of Paranoia, a 9/11 survivor's tale. 10% of profits from sales of Paranoia will be donated to the Twin Towers Orphan Fund (www.ttof.org). For more information, see www.jebraun.com.

Mary Wilkinson

Mary Wilkinson says:

While I feel that I cannot

While I feel that I cannot comment on your blog because I am not an American citizen I want to tell you that I found your words to be very thought provoking.

Ellen Sheeley

Ellen R. Sheeley says:

You can comment, Mary. I am

You can comment, Mary.

I am still watching and giving the president the benefit of the doubt, John.  But I've been concerned all along about his inexperience, and I worry that some people are confusing self confidence with competence. 

It takes a long time and a lot of experience to develop good judgment, and I worry that President Obama is jumping into too many areas he knows little about and attempting to micromanage.  This is not the job of the president.

His hold over the press is also concerning me, not just the part he is controlling, but the voluntary submission of so many in the major media.  I would like to see much more questioning.

That said, I heard Bill Maher has started taking jabs at the president, so maybe the long honeymoon will soon be over.

 

John Braun

John Braun says:

Thanks...

If Bill Maher is taking shots, it could be divorce time!  :)  I wanted to give Obama the benefit of the doubt, though many will not believe that because I've got some pretty conservative views.  I have voted Democrat a number of times in the past, but something about his inexperience, his background, his ideas scared me.  I told friends that supported him that I hoped I would never be able to say I told you so.  I prayed that I would be wrong and was hoping to admit that I was wrong, but I don't think I was.  I'm not often pessimistic about anything.  Unfortunately, I've found little so far to be optimistic about.  He's doing okay in Afghanistan, I guess that counts!

Ellen Sheeley

Ellen R. Sheeley says:

After I wrote the above, I

After I wrote the above, I thought about it some more.  I think one of the things that is really concerning me is the amount of spending he's doing in such a short period of time.  I am a fiscal conservative, but a social liberal.  And the spending is really making my stomach churn.  I'm a banker, and those dollar amounts are massive, even by banking standards.  And too much spending is exactly the reason we are in this mess.  Will my generation ever be able to retire?

In the end, though, he is our guy.  So we have to throw our support to him and wish him well because our fates are tied to his.  Or at least this is how I view it.

John Braun

John Braun says:

Thank You

Thanks for the comment.  I have become so passionate about this country over the past year.  That being said, my wife and I spent our honeymoon in your beautiful country in 2001, beginning for two days in Dublin and travelling along the southern coast and back up the west coast, leaving from Shannon.  We stayed at Glin Castle, Drumolland, saw the Cliffs of Moher, spent a night in a pub in Youghal, of course saw the Blarney Stone, Waterford, Powerscourt Gardens, and the Ring of Beara.  We loved it and often joke that if things go wrong enough in this country, we're headed back to Ireland!

Mary Wilkinson

Mary Wilkinson says:

Okay, Ellen, I will. At

Okay, Ellen, I will. At least President Obama beats the last choice of President.

Ellen Sheeley

Ellen R. Sheeley says:

:-D  I know you love this

:-D  I know you love this country, and your husband and sons are citizens, so I think it's fine for you to have opinions and comment, Mary.  Even without those, though, in a land of free speech, I'd never advocate for someone to self censor.

John Braun

John Braun says:

Or so the media would have

Or so the media would have you believe. I'm not a big supporter of George W. Bush..I actually voted against his second term, but for every flub and gaffe the media played ad nauseum, Obama has one buried...I've seen clips of tons of mistakes Obama's made (saying he had campaigned in 57 states and had 2 more to go for instance, when there are 50 total). Obama is a good speaker when his teleprompter is working, but the media made Bush look stupid whenever they could.

As for Bush..he spent way too much...more like a liberal than a conservative without a doubt and I criticized him for his bailouts. Obama took what Bush did and quadrupled it. Obama has spent more in his first 100 days than EVERY president from Washington to Bush COMBINED and has put us in an unsustainable (his words) amount of debt. He is taking over the private sector and wants to continue with healthcare. The highest % of the GDP the US Government has ever controlled was in the high 20s during either Carter or the First Bush..I forget...Obama is in the 30s now and will be in the high 40s if healthcare passes.. He's brought us to socialism whether people want to admit it or not and that goes against everything this country was founded on.

The war is the big thing people despised Bush for. Bush had bad intelligence AND Hussein was leading people to believe he had WMDs but I do agree that Bush jumped the gun. His biggest fault in the whole war was a lack of an exit plan. The surge worked. The pullout of our troops is nothing of Obama's doing...the surge worked and the Iraqis were trained to take over security all under Bush. If it weren't for the surge, there's no way Obama could have pulled those troops. It was so successful, he's using the same tactic in Afghanistan. In the end, there are women in Iraq who are not kept in RAPE ROOMS and citizens not being tortured by their leader, so do the ends justify the means in this case? I'd think so.

Obama has, on the other hand, come in making bold promises he can't deliver on (can't figure out HOW to close Guantanamo - and acknowledges that Guantanamo is his target only because people confuse it with Abu Gharib - and now is considering the same Bush doctrine of detaining prisoners indefinitely). He swore we needed to do SOMETHING NOW about the economy...or unemployment would go over 8%!! Well, trillions later, it's at 9.5% with no sign of reversing.

Is Obama better than Bush? If Obama means losing my freedom, than I'd take Bush any day.

Sorry...as I said, I've become very passionate about this subject! :)

Ellen Sheeley

Ellen R. Sheeley says:

John, when Obama used the

John, when Obama used the figure 57, I assumed he meant all 50 states plus American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, etc., where the citizens can vote in our elections.  But he should've clarified that so people understood.

The surge has worked in the near term because money was given to the Iraqis who were opposing us in exchange for supporting us.  They have cracked down on human rights, though, so the women are worse off than they were in the interval between Hussein and the surge.  Also, I don't know if buying the loyalty of the enemy is going to be successful after we pull out.  So I think the jury is out on this for now.  Our U.S. propaganda is telling us it's been successful, but if you live in the region, you can see for yourself it's, at best, a mixed result.

Agree with you, though, that if we were going to open up the Iraq can of worms, we damned well should've known what we were getting into and how we'd get out of it.  Big mistake.  Huge.  And we have given the other dictators in the region everything they need to turn their people against us and divert attention from their own incompetence and brutality so they can prop themselves up for generations to come.  Some of these dictators are even ones we consider allies.

John Braun

John Braun says:

Fully Agreed

I think he meant 47 at the time and given the tiring schedule it's understandable. My point is the media would have played that ad nauseum had Bush said it. It would have been all over the Daily Show and in every late night host's monologue. I see your point about Iraq...as you say, the verdict is out.