t.s eliot wasn’t kidding…
April can be a cruel month. CBS announced the cancellation of Guiding Light, ER broadcast its final episode and The New York Times Corporation is threatening to close down my hometown newspaper of record, The Boston Globe – and that was just the first week. Here’s hoping for the promised May flowers because we’ve certainly had plenty of April showers, literally here in Boston, as well as figuratively.
Maybe it was the close proximity to the announcement of GL’s cancellation. But as I watched the series finales of ER and U.S. version of the British series, Life on Mars, I saw one parallel after another between the two primetime series and soap opera in general – and GL in particular.
Given its 15 year run on NBC, ER might be the primetime equivalent of GL’s 57 years on CBS. When ER premiered in 1994, I was writing about nursing and how nurses were portrayed in the media, so of course I watched. Fascinating as the cases were, it was the characters and their relationships, personal and professional, that kept me watching. As with daytime soaps, when actors left new characters arrived and were seamlessly woven into the action with the remaining characters. But through it all, it was chief resident Mark Greene who held the show together. After Anthony Edwards left in 2002, the show was never quite the same.
The writers had positioned the last remaining original character, Noah Wyle’s John Carter, to assume Mark Greene’s mantle. But then the story took Carter out of the ER. His time in Africa interested me not at all, so I pretty muched stopped watching. When I did tune in now and then, I recognized some of the new actors, but not the characters they played and I never reconnected with the show.
The situation on ER was roughly analogous to GL in the early 2000s. The action was split between San Cristobel, where Reva had married a prince during Kim Zimmer’s absence from the show, and Springfield, where a mob family, the Santos, dominated. Returning viewers asked themselves the same question I did about ER: “Who are these people?” which is what happens when a soap’s core family is pushed to the sidelines. The difference, of course, is that on ER, it was the actors who made the decision to leave, not TPTB.
But when the end came, brought back all of the original cast members, weaving them seamlessly into several episodes that culminated in a rich and emotionally satisfying series finale that evoked the very first episode.
As word of GL’s cancellation spread, so did the suggestions (here and here among others) for how to end the show, but Mark Harding was the first to understand the lessons ER’s finale held for GL. The possibility that GL will find a new home on cable or on-line raises the ante a bit; not everything can be wrapped up and tied with a pretty bow. Here, the ER finale offered a valuable lesson: the show might be ending, but life in the ER continues with the next generation. The third season finale of Friday Night Lights offers some insights as well. Because that episode was written and shot before FNL was picked up, there had to be enough closure should it have been the series finale, yet leave enough potential story should the show continues, which, thankfully, it will.
Switching gears, Life on Mars’ final show was an object lesson in how not to end a show. Not a primetime soap per se, there were still some interesting parallels. First, because the show was moved from LA to NYC (reportedly for tax advantages), LOM, like Dick Wolf’s Law and Order franchise, featured current and former soap actors: Jennifer Ferrin, Elizabeth Hubbard, Matthew Cowles, Phyllis Somerville, Renee Goldsberry – and from GL, Grant Aleksander, and the first Dinah, Paige Turco.
Then there’s the time slot issue. A significant (though difficult to quantify) problem for GL has been the 14 media markets where the show airs in the morning. This includes some major markets – Boston, Chicago, Miami and New York City. For LOM fans, finding the show was often a challenge as ABC tried to find the best time slot. And it didn’t help matters when ABC left viewers hanging for seven – yes, seven – weeks after a cliffhanger of staggering proportions while the show was off the air. Then, when LOM returned after the season premier of Lost, instead of airing the next episode, they… Well, read the sorry details here. I know it seems as though I’m getting a little off track here, but the disdain ABC exhibited toward viewers with this incident echoes so much of what soap fans have had to put up with over the years. And it also throws into sharp relief the sad reality that scripted continuing drama is as endangered a species on network primetime as it is in the afternoon.
But while LOM was a sci-fi time-travel tale, it was fundamentally about relationships, in particular, the relationship between Sam and his parents. The set-up was that in 2008 police officer Sam Tyler was hit by a car trying to save his girlfriend and woke up as a cop in 1973. The emotional thrust of the story was Sam getting back to 2008 (okay, 2009). Since the writers had the opportunity to prepare a final episode, viewers were expecting Sam to return to the present and pick up where he had left. Since the show’s premier featured the David Bowie classic, Life on Mars, few viewers took the title literally. And yet, at the end of the finale, evoking for me memories of clone Reva, Amish Reva, and perhaps most apropos, time-travel Reva, there was the cast of LOM waking up on a spaceship in 2035, hurtling towards Mars.
© 2009 Lynn Liccardo
Limited Licensing: I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the Creative Commons Attribution license, granting distribution of my copyrighted work without making changes, with mandatory attribution to Lynn Liccardo and for non-commercial purposes only. Lynn Liccardo
- Login Or register To Post Comments
- Send To A Friend



Jennifer Gibbons says:
I watched the final episode of ER...
and I fast forwarded it to see Carter, Susan, Kerry, etc. I didn't care about the new people (Although I was delighted to see Alexis Blendel from Gilmore Girls)
I'm watching EastEnders right now where they introduced a new family, the Moons. Spencer Moon just got in a car accident with Martin Fowler who hit Jamie Mitchell while texting a message on his phone,and Spencer is devestated about what happened. What struck me about the story was how the Moons have not taken over the show like the San Christobel/Mob stories took over Guiding Light, but complimented other stories-with Christopher Parker's amazing performance as Spencer, Shane Ritchie's layered protrayal of Alfie Moon intersecting with Peggy Mitchell and Kat Slater, and Hilda Braid's sweet Nana Moon dancing with the older characters on the show. I really wish American soaps learned from the British how to introduce a family on a show.
Jennifer Gibbons, Red Room
Mark Harding says:
Endings, evolutions
Wonderful blog entry (and here's hoping May is a better month!).
While I obviously agree with you that building to some kind of satisfying ending for GL (ala ER) would be a wonderful way to honor Springfield, I am struck by how STRONG the sentiment is not to cancel the show.
Moreover, when I look at GL items on mainstream media sites (e.g., TV Guide), there are literally HUNDREDS of fans lobbying for a Lifetime Networ future. The petition to save GL had, this morning, about 11,000 signatures....so there is some momentum.
It seems to be borne largely out of Otalia fans...many of whom are new fans, and have joined just for that couple.
I'm not sure what this means. Part of me feels that this was a remarkably clever move by Jill Lorie Hurst and Ellen Wheeler. This level of buzz has saved other shows, and I see no reason that it might not work here. On the other hand, Otalia is absolutely NOT classic Guiding Light. Olivia is one of the last surviving elements of that San Cristobal mess, and Natalia is a newish character with no real connections to the canvas (save her love for Gus Aitorro).
I think it means that if GL survives, it may not be the GL of Reverend Rutledge or Bert Bauer. It may, in effect, be a spinoff...small in scope...that plays to a particular fanbase.
If that happens, is that okay? I'm inclined to think yes. It's like an evolution.
I happen to think ER could do that too...a new series based around Dr. Carter's center. That would actually be pretty glorious to see.
Lynn Liccardo says:
i don't know that the two are mutually exclusive...
bringing the show to a satisfying ending AND laying the groundwork for future stories. that's exactly what friday night lights did so brilliantly in the final show of the 3rd season. and you're certainly right when you talk about the survival of gl as an evolution, which is really the story of the show: radio-to-television; 15 minutes-to-30-minutes-to-an-hour; black-and-white-to-color; live-to-tape-to-edited-video-to-digital; network-to-?
you're also right about otalia not being classic gl. but what's far more important is that otalia marks a return to classic soap opera storytelling!
this process of moving the gl to cable, even if it fails (and despite the popular momentum, they may not be able to get the money to work), will hold important lessons for the future, not just for the other soaps, but for scripted dramas in general, and continuing dramas in particular. i wonder if TPTB in primetime programming understand the connection and are paying attention?