A sober pondering of exclamation !!!s
The exclamation point, punctuation’s whoopee cushion, is putting on a tuxedo! It’s appearing in all the classiest places!
And I don’t think I like it one bit!!!
The exclamation point and I have never been really what you’d call chums. I try and inject humor into everything I write. Hell, I try and inject humor into everything I do.
That’s why even life’s most mundane routines, things like attending church and having sex, are more fun with me!
See, there you go. I offered a lame little joke that might be mildly amusing without the -- “Wink! Wink! Nudge! Nudge!” -- of the exclamation point. Instead, an otherwise harmless line becomes as tedious as being stuck in the middle seat next to the obnoxious joker who caps every punchline with a giggly, “Get it! Get it!”
But in another cultural battle I sense I’m bound to lose, I see more and more exclamation points scattered like indelicate little 12-point erections throughout the future of my carefully crafted sentences.
Blame Serena Williams.
See, while serious writers like me were shackled to our desks listening to tyrannical English teachers rhapsodize about things like semi-colons, she was off learning the tennis stroke that would earn fame and multiple millions of dollars.
The poor thing.
She never learned that the exclamation point was the -- pick one: Henny Youngman, Pauly Shore, Russell Brand -- of punctuation. It had no place in serious writing. It was promiscuous. It was gaudy. It lacked requisite subtlety.
And, ironically, it wasn’t funny! It wasn’t funny with one exclamation point! And it certainly wasn’t funny with three!!!
That’s why after her profanity (and exclamation point) laced tirade at the U.S. Open, she felt compelled to Tweet her remorse.
Here’s how she began her apology: “Hey guys!!!”
That’s how to punctuate a party invitation, not an apology. Like other celebrity tweeters, she relies on the exclamation point to convey emotions which she is incapable of otherwise expressing.
Of course, serious journalists like those anal retentive sorts at the New York Times are by rigid custom forbidden from doctoring those sorts of sentiments. Same goes for more and more high-profile news organizations. They repeat the tweets word for word, exclamation point for exclamation point.
I’ve been reading The Times for 25 years and I don’t remember ever seeing a single exclamation point in a news column, but -- Shazam!!! -- there were three of giddy goodies romping across the sports section like a Radio City Rockette chorus line.
My first thought was there had to be an morning long meeting about how to deal with the wanton exclamation points, and that at least three copy editors felt honor bound to commit ritualistic hari-kari when the points sashayed into print.
It’s funny, too, that I’m so opposed to exclamation points in print when I’m practically a walking exclamation point.
It’s true.
I never say, “Hey, let’s all skip church today.”
I always say, “Hey, let’s all skip church today!”
It’s never with a sober sense of mournful obligation that I say to the boys, “There’s a big game on tonight. Let’s use that as an excuse to meet at the bar and get drunk.”
Not at all. I say it like this: “There’s a big game on tonight! Let’s use that as an excuse to meet at the bar and get drunk!”
If you’ve ever seen me say that, and I’ll say it three times this week, there’s a storm of confetti flying around my head and the John Philip Sousa march “76 Trombones!” is soundtracking the pronouncement.
But as tweets become more and more common, we’re bound to see more and more exclamation points in print as people point out the level of euphoria they’re feeling that a: they are done with the laundry! b: That the minestrone was delicious!! Or that -- hallelujah -- c: “Dancing w/ Stars” is on in 30 minutes!!!
And the progression just noted is accurate. One exclamation point denotes joy! Two means elation!! Three means pure spiritual rapture!!!
It’s the grammatical equivalent of the discredited Cold War nuclear strategy of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). We’re on track to deploy so many multiple exclamation points that it will soon be impossible to register even poignant emotion in print without putting punctuation’s party hat on every sentence.
And that makes me sad.
Really, really sad!!!
- Login Or register To Post Comments
- Send To A Friend



David Beemer says:
While we're at it
While we're at it, could we also get rid of emoticons? No, I don't suppose so. They come in handy when you've just hit someone with a zinger, and you don't want them looking you up :)
Chris Rodell says:
yes, the little flirts
I agree with you David, but the emoticons do appeal to my sense of whimsy, even though I don't think I've ever used one.
I guess I substitute the dreaded exclamation point to convey the same. Like here!
Thanks for checking in and have a great day!
And I mean it.
Chris
Ellen R. Sheeley says:
Some of us gals need our
Some of us gals need our emotis. Do not mess with the emotis! ;-)
Chris Rodell says:
They're excused
Yes, I find them charming and, as I said, a tad flirty. I like that! Still, I've decided they're not for me. I don't know why a guy who doesn't mind wearing pink in public is afraid to type a little winky, wink emoticon but, alas, he does.
Thanks Ellen! (note the proper use of joyful exclamation point?)
David Beemer says:
I shall redirect my attack to news articles
I shall redirect my attack to news articles that use the same old chestnuts, year after year. "deadly shooting" "visibly shaken" etc. Do they actually teach them to use these things over and over and over again? Is there some unspoken contract that every shooting will be deadly, like we won't know it probably was unless they tell us? I would just once like someone to say "Yesterdays casual shooting will not be prosecuted" or something like that.
Chris Rodell says:
rerun again and again
So true, David. I wonder if anyone's ever dared to rerun a TV newscast to see if anybody would notice. "Fire on the north side; shooting on the southside; traffic at the tunnel ... time for weather!"
I'm convinced most of those terms you mention come from police speak. Reporters are too timid to liven up their stories -- crime stories! -- with a little color.
As a young reporter, I always dreamed of getting a crime involving a "blunt instrument" and having it turn out to be a tuba! Wouldn't that be a fun story to write!
Dale Estey says:
There's a hold-up in the
There's a hold-up in the Bronx! Brooklyn's broken out in fights!! There's a traffic jam in Harlem that's backed up to Jackson Heights!!! There's a scout troop short a child!!!! Khrushchev's due at Idlewild!!!!!!!! Car 54 - Where Are You?!?!?!?!?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Rosy Cole says:
Have to confess
I like exclamation points, Chris. They really nail your colours to the mast. Entertaining blog, all the same. Thanks.
You know, I always think of you as the Jack Lemmon of RR, although much younger and to all appearances alive, of course!!
Chris Rodell says:
Lemmon, eh?
Well, that makes me pucker. Thanks! I take that as a compliment. He was great.
I like the E.P.s in small doses. I'm sure, Rosy, you won't abuse 'em.
Now, brace yourself: here comes a storm of 'em . . . Have a great weekend!!!!
Chris
Thomas Burchfield says:
Wow.
Chris: Your essay on exclamation points was hilarious. I laughed so much. I 100% agree with everything you say. So much so, I have stopped using exclamation points completely because of how uncool they make my writing look.
For example, examine the sentence: "Help. Help. My hair is on fire." See how much more sophisticated this sentence is without exclamation points? With exclamation points, the sentence would appear to have been written by a melodramatic hysterical drama queen who, perhaps, attends the opera (where exclamation points flourish like poisonous weeds! Oh. Sorry. Didn't mean to let that slip in there . . . ).
But without exclamation points, the line appears to have been spoken by a level-headed person who knows what he is doing and whose needs are simple: namely, a big bucket of water.
Thank you again for your essay. It was really wowza.
Have an ordinary day.
Chris Rodell says:
Laughing without exhalting
I painted myself into an awkward corner about overuse of the E.P. when I'd like to use at least one or two responding to you.
Oh, what the hell . . . thanks!!!
When it's used judiciously, as you've done here, it's perfectly fine -- and on this issue, I'm the boss!
I appreciate you taking the time to read and flatter me with a comment. Continue to use exclamation points as you see fit. And I respect your appreciation of the literary device known as sarcasm.
Thomas Burchfield says:
My Next Goal
is to get rid of all questions marks. I wonder: How I should go about this.
Chris Rodell says:
There ya go
I'd say you're off to a good start with that one, Thomas.
Have a great weekend!
David Beemer says:
Why don't we
WhydontwejustgetridofallpunctuationthinkofthetypingwewillsaveYouknowithad hadtocometothis. Sorry
Leslie Bradford says:
Flip it!
Hey Chris,
Are you saying you have sex in church? "Cause that would require an exclamation point or three for sure. Or, do you just have sex before or after church, which really does not warrant any exclamation point.
What about sentences used to describe deep regret and dark emotion? Do you think there should be something with equal impact as the often misused and misunderstood exclamation mark? Perhaps a reverse exclamation would denote the depths of sadness buried in a sentence. A fat blob with a dot on top.
Snap! I think I'm on to something here. It looks like a tear drop falling from an eye!
Hang on. Now that I give it some more thought, this would put a lot of emoticons on unemployment. Obama would never approve.
Better get back to Eat, Shoots and Leaves.
Leslie
Chris Rodell says:
Love it!
Hi Leslie,
What a great idea! Flipping the e.p. to denote sadness is genius. I hope we can make it happen.
And, no, I've never had sex in church, but I spend plenty of church time thinking about it. My wife is the church organist -- my friends always giggle when I point that out, but that's what she does.
And you've given me another reminder to get Eat, Shoots & Leaves. I want to get that and the June Cassagrandes books about punctuation. I love her stuff here on RedRoom.
Have a great day! (yes, I'm allowed to enthuse)
Chris
Chris Rodell says:
Ha!
Very funny, David. You've struck the true essence of my argument.
Sharon Merritt says:
The Proverbial Wind from my Sails
I've been accused of over doing it myself with said e.p.'s. As a dialogue writer first, my inspiration comes from the conversations going on in my head. (I've been seen fighting with my husband while in my car alone and no phone to my ear)
My characters ARE VERY ENTHUSIASTIC PEOPLE!!!!
I must be careful not to piss off the e.p. police in the future.
-Sharon
Chris Rodell says:
You have the right to remain enthused . . .
As a spokesman for the E.P.P.D. I give you a get out of jail free card. I mentioned that I use 'em all the time in speech, too.
Thanks for writing, Sharon, and for your funny comment.
Chris
David Beemer says:
I think of it like cussing
I think of it like cussing. There are times where nothing else has quite the same impact, but a steady diet dilutes the idea that something important is happening, like when the news uses the same breathless excitement to describe a pop star getting into trouble that would best be saved for a bridge collapse.
Joseph Mooney says:
Elated Editors
Hey Chris!!! I really!!! hate exclamation points!!! Too!!!
Twitty tennis-tweeters, silly-soup-swillers, and loud,loquacious launderers are mere neophytes in the ranks of the overly-elated. I can almost find a soft spot for them. However, this is only when I think about what many of our at least equally excited editors have done to Shakespeare over the years. With their johnny one note application of the dreaded pointer-up of pointlessness, what would be a subtly faceted build is translated into repetitive, characterless, generic emotion. They should know better.
I'm with you... If it ain't there, then dammit, don't tell me I should feel it! --I meant that one. It actually felt good. Great essay--and thanks...for "pointing up" the issue so well.
Chris Rodell says:
Ha!
I feel sheepish, Joseph, resorting to the dreaded E.P., but your comment's funny enough to warrant it. So well put. Like people yapping too loudly in public, I fear this a battle we're bound to lose. When it becomes this easy to parody, the battle seems loss. I don't think there's anything on the horizon that can make people more grammatically serious, dang it.
Also, sorry for being so late in responding. I'm having e-mail issues that are delaying my communications.
Thanks and have a great day . . . and I mean it!!!
Chris