It is not so much that I don't look at those innumerable 'best of year' lists - it's that I forget them by the next day. It's the same with movie and sports and sexy person lists. I don't remember who won the Best Actress Oscar or indeed the Best Movie Oscar for 2008. I don't remember who won the Orange or the Giller or the Pulitzer this year. The most notable fact is that none of them were me.

So, this guy's list is as good as any. Better than most in that he chose Kafka.

*********************************

Best of 2008? Please Don't Bother --

Jack Engelhard

November 30, 2008 11:43 PM EST

So here we go again. News organizations and what-not trot out the best of the year - also the worst. The worst is easy for anyone who makes these lists.

But I hate these lists. Please don't tell me what books I should have read, movies I should have seen, or music I should have listened to; I only listened to Beethoven anyway.

So far as world events all I remember is war, right up to this minute. Pick the spot, and there was war or some kind of disturbance. People just don't get along.

On the domestic front, there was politics, that, and nothing else. I remember something about an election. Right, Barack Obama beat good old what's his name. I understand, by the way, that Tina Fey, who impersonated Sarah Palin, has been awarded a six million dollar contract to write some kind of book. If you're not Tina Fey, good luck getting published in that same publishing house. The money's all gone.

. . .

Now we come to what really annoys me - THE 10 BEST BOOKS OF 2008. Can't open a newspaper or a website without tripping over some such list, and a few of them even list the ONE HUNDRED BEST BOOKS of 2008. Really? There were a hundred good books written and published this year?

I resent being told what I should have read, what I should have liked. So much of this depends on what the literati deem as the genius of the month, or the year. Usually, in fact, when someone says MUST SEE or MUST READ - those I avoid. Once in a while I get sucked into a MUST READ and am always disappointed.

First of all, every list is different, names different books and different writers. Is reading a subjective activity or what? Actually, everything is subjective. You like vanilla. I like chocolate. Nobody is right about this and nobody is wrong, and sometimes I prefer vanilla; depends on the mood I'm in. As we all know - something these list-makers don't know - there is no accounting for taste. Also, reading is the most private business we do, along with sex, and I don't see any respectable newspaper listing THE BEST SEX OF 2008. (If you come across anything like this, let me know.)

But since you asked, my favorite books of 2008 are: John W. Cassell's CROSSROADS, 1969; Franz Kafka's THE TRIAL; Richard Matheson's I AM LEGEND; Lee Server's AVA GARDNER, LOVE IS NOTHING; Ernest Hemingway's A MOVEABLE FEAST; Judah Halevi's THE KUZARI; James M. Cain's THE POSTMAN ALWAYS RINGS TWICE; any short story by Linda Shelnutt about Coal Country - but topping it all is, of course, King David's Psalms and Ecclesiastes, written by David son, King Solomon. The best of all, naturally, is the Bible. That's number one. After that, every kind of writing is commentary. Yes, the Bible is the best book written this year, as it was the best book written more than 3,000 years ago.

(more)

Whole article at:

http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977522287