Obama
All my life, against whites and blacks, men and women, gays and straights I have always argued that Americans need to be a tribe, a real honest to God tribe, if we are going to move forward, if we mean to survive. Everything that has ever been best about us has adhered to that notion. Every deep failure has been the result of straying from that ideal.
When those planes smacked into New York, murdering not only all those innocent souls but also any notion that we, Americans, were somehow above the world's mundane concerns, they also provided a window for the right person to step through and lead us toward that goal of Tribe. It was a tiny window, maybe only a week long, during which more of us than at any time in history thought of ourselves as a unit, as a tribe. We were united in our grief, united in our disgust, united in our desire to do something, anything, to prove that that ugly moment wouldn't define us for the next few centuries as so man ugly moments had in the past.
George Bush could have, during that window, insured that he would be the single greatest President in history if he'd only spoken to that grief and harnessed it into what it necessarily should have become.
"I feel what you feel," he should have said. "I know what you know. We are in this together."
But he didn't. He failed.
He squandered the moment, that precious tiny moment, on more political maneuvering that led us, ultimately to not only the sorry social/economic state we're in now but also to the bloody morass of the Iraq conflict. He has cost us lives. He has cost us livelihoods. He has cost us centuries of hard won respect not only on the world stage but also our collective belief that the notion underpinning our society- that divergent ethnicity or gender or faith was not a deal breaker, was not even an impediment but an asset. Instead he made us craven. He made us desperate. He made us torturers. He made spying on our neighbors a necessary duty and the "soft bigotry" he claimed to decry an act of patriotism.
But, worse than all those things, worse really than anything, he failed to see us as a nation. He failed to see us as a single people, despite our superficial differences and to remind us of that positive, nurturing, affirming fact in our time of need.
I have hated him for that failure. I have hated him for all the others as well and for the lives he and his cabal have cost us but I have really hated him for killing that moment. A little of our collective future died when he did that, strangled with both hands by him, personally, on international television.
I used to try to make this point to people but, largely, they haven't wanted to hear it. Not since that week, certainly. They need to eat and fill their tanks and, dammit, we aren't a tribe so why didn't I just shut the hell up about it?
Barack Obama is why. Not just the man himself. He's just a politician at the end of the day, but, if even half of what he said is true, both of his plans and the motivation for those plans, I think we may just have a shot at a second chance. You don't get many of those in life. The older I get, the more I know that to be true. Second chances are rare and important second chances are almost unheard of.
I honestly never thought I'd live to see it. Certainly not after that moment passed. I absolutely never thought I'd se a black man, surrounded by tens of thousands of Americans of all stripes (and watched by millions more) make that case not only as a good idea but as the central reason for why he should be the next President.
E PLURIBUS UNUM.
Hot damn.
So. The window's open again.
I hope we don't fail.
Maybe I'll live to see that tribe after all.
- Login Or register To Post Comments
- Send To A Friend
RSS- Bookmark With:







Belle Yang says:
Hot Damn
Yes, count me in the American tribe.
Geoffrey Thorne says:
Hell, Yeah!
You're in, baby!
Jennifer Gibbons says:
beautiful.
simply beautiful. I want in as well.
Geoffrey Thorne says:
!!
Everybody's in!
Rosy Cole says:
Random reflections
I feel a bit guilty for openly admitting this, but you can probably count in half the population of Britain as well. However, geography can't be discounted from the equation, even in the global village.
I wonder, does 'divergent ethnicity' as a real strength work better on a vast continent than a tiny island? The English are largely tolerant and take people as they find them, but it feels as though the culture this 'sceptr'd isle' recognises and needs has been lost in an absurd wilderness of Political Correctness which serves no one and least of all her indigenous people.
Did flight from Catholicism (and its core belief in the dignity of the human person) in 16th and 17th century Europe really give rise to all this?
Geoffrey Thorne says:
hmmm
Sadly the US wiped out most of its indigenous people and doesn't treat their descendants very well now. The rest of us, even slave descendants like me, are squatters.
Personally I'm not a big fan of buzzwords in general and "PC" in specific but I think the "problem" you're describing isn't one that can get too much traction here. We are, after all, a nation of mutts and castoffs. Difficult to get too high on the horse when your granddad was a bootlegger, slaver or froth-mouthed heretic. New York City alone seems to have been designed specifically to take the air out of peoples egos.
We're as close to a classless society (in every sense) as humanity has produced. Not so the UK. Cultural change of the type you're describing DOES erode the core ethos of every European nation which are, after all, merely the outgrowths of the tribal enclaves mixed with the Roman system of provinces. Saxons, Britons, Franks, Spainairds, etc. All these nations are ethnic enclaves at their heart. It may be that some of those enclaves will have to give up a good deal of what they perceive to be their traditional definitions of tribe in order to survive even as the U. S. must ultimately forge one to do the same.
I don't know, honestly. I've spent a total of five days in England, spread over several years. I don't know how the culture actually works on the ground. But your television is tasty.
I do think the UK and the US have similar cultures, how could they not, but some very glaring fundamental differences as well.
I don't beleive acceptance of the so-called Other or tolerance of the many differences exhibited in an heterogenous culture means you don't stick to the core ethos that makes you a culture in the first place. In our case that ethos is what binds, superseding differences of class and ethnicity. That's the idea, anyway.
In other words, what defines Britons of various hues, shapes and backgrounds is not the same as what, in theory, defines Americans. Or Canadians or Australians (that's the family tree, right?)
Our country was designed to exist as a response to the rigid classism and ethnic and religious divisions of Europe. It's written into our founding documents and sits at the core of every American's being whether they were born here or just took the oath this morning.
"You're no better than me, you bastard," we all think. "So don't start popping off." We ALL believe this and most of us believe it in a fairly confrontational and aggressive way. It's part of why we irritate "foreigners" so much. That and the burger franchises.
There are those here who would like us to have the rigid class structures and divisions that still hang on in Europe but, frankly, we're just too damned big for that to work. So they settle for economic domination and defacto classism where they can enforce it (mainly cities for some types while mainly small town for others). But it's nothing like what you guys have vis a vis class distinctions.
I don't think Britons have to lose anything by embracing fully their current multi-faceted populace and overlapping subcultures. But it is likely something will have to shift as a result of that embrace and that means something will likely be lost. Whether that loss is easy and painless or bloody and brutal or whether it's ultimately a good or bad thing is up to you guys. What are you willing to give up to extend your family?
And, to answer your last question, "No. It's all Henry Tudor's fault. Randy bastard. NOW look what he's done."
Eric Nichols says:
Hi Geoffrey: As we
Hi Geoffrey:
As we say up here....."Alaska is a classless society, cuz none of us gots any class."
It's no accident that our very Constitution expressly forbids the granting of titles of nobility. "Been there, done that," was the implicit mindset of our founding fathers. (Now, my wife is English, and feels somewhat obligated to follow the Royal family and such. And I have to admit I do enjoy some of the classiness of English folk...we're probably a bit guilty of throwing out some of the baby with the bathwater).
That being said....America is much NEWER than England, of course. Although I speak English, I don't have any closer affiity to England than I do to Denmark, where the other half of my family comes from. America is an entirely NEW concept and place. It's easy to lose sight of that.
Linda Jo Hunter says:
I love this
I go off on my day refreshed and filled with hope after reading this.
Rosy Cole says:
Thanks, Geoffrey...
...for taking time out to respond so fully to my comment. Certainly a lot to think about. The truth often gets lost down the crevices between idealism and what actually happens. I have a black slave ancestor myself as a matter of fact.