The Next Species
We were talking about the next species to come. The species after Homo sapiens. She said she hoped its defining characteristic would be a new sixth sense. And when I asked her what sense that might be she said, “A sense of guilt.”
I formulated the idea that there already were members of the next species living here on our little planet. After all, it’s not always the case that a new species pops suddenly and distinctly into its new existence precisely at the time when the old dies out. We now know that both can survive, at least for a while, along different evolutionary paths. I thought of all the good things good people are doing against the tide of so much bad. And so I said, “Maybe there are already some of them amongst us. Some of the next species who have this intuitive sixth sense of guilt of which you speak.”
And she smiled with that melancholy blue-eyed smile of a beautiful vegetarian cat-rescuing pacifist and answered, “Yes. Perhaps a relative few.”
I wanted to believe that the current species could develop, en masse, this sixth sense of which she spoke—this sensitivity to how one living organism affects another’s sole chance at life and living, a deeper appreciation for the profundity of nature at is best, a longing for fairness and equality in a decidedly unjust world. But the televised jabber of the nightly news interrupted the formation of my thought, the scenes of disparity and avarice and rampant destruction undermining the premise before it was fully laid. And I recalled the simple logic of that aspect of the theory that says that more often than not, when evolutionary branches sprout new offshoots, only one or the other survives. “Then it’s probably only a question of time,” I said over the blaring shock of the broadcasted news. “A question of time before the new humanoid species or the old predominates and the fate of the world is determined.”
And she said, “Yes. It makes me feel guilty just to think about it.”
- Login Or register To Post Comments
- Send To A Friend



David Beemer says:
Oh, man.
Oh man. I feel like the toy dinosaur in Toy Story. He finds out he caused something bad to happen, and now, on top of everything, he Has Guilt.
James GAitis says:
Toying around
Hmmmmmmmmmm. Did those folks who did Toy Story steal my concept?!@#!? I haven't seen it, so I don't know. I do like dinosaurs and toys, though, and feel not the slightest hint of guilt about it . . .
Louise Marley says:
I'm afraid . . .
the sixth-sensers would be wiped out in a week.
Joe Sweeney says:
In What Sense, This Guilt?
I think many of us suffer from internal guilt born from the message "your not good enough." The big ones are Catholic Guilt, Jewish Guilt and Parental Guilt. I think this Sense of Guilt would need to be externally focused - look at what we're doing to this earth and to each other.
James GAitis says:
Sense vs. Nonsense
Hi Joe,
I very much agree. Maybe our current species does have something of a sense of guilt, the problem being that it is being rendered ineffective by confusing concepts such as "original sin" and the like. As you suggest, the Next Species' sense of guilt hopefully will be more sensible.
David Beemer says:
Maybe guilt is too strong a medicine
Maybe guilt is too strong a medicine. Sometimes it makes you feel disempowered. It might be best taken in the form of taking some responsibility for the mess we have made. Well, I think I have probably beaten the pharmacist metaphor to death, so I'll stop now.
James GAitis says:
Guilt Prescription
Hi David,
I would guess that the answer to whether guilt is too strong a medicine depends on how it was prescribed. In a way the current remedy for a lack of Sense of Guilt seems to be: "Take two of these and you'll feel better in the morning."