Teaching the Tao is a Contradiction
I keep teaching books that I want to understand. I never end up truly understanding any of them fully, and then I will stop and then later come back to them later, at another semester, feeling pretty confident until I realize that there is still so much I haven't seen yet and so much that I have forgotten.
Thank goodness!
I think it's good to give loved books a break though, so that we can go back to them without flinching and feeling slightly green at the gills that we have to read them again. I needed at least these five months between Hamlet doses, and I'm thankful that Belle has started the Lear festival so that I can get into the new saddle of this old favorite.
What I started reading this morning is the Tao Te Ching. I can't say that I teach this at all because I can't live maybe one centimeter of the precepts and ideas within.
For instance, try this one: "Content with an ordinary life . . . "
Or, "If you keep your mind from judging/and aren't led by the senses,/your heart will find peace."
Or, "He never expects results;/thus he is never disappointed."
Yeah, okay.
Now, let me pontificate about the history and time frame and culture from which this set of chapters or poems emerged and I can talk pretty reasonably. But when my students and I start reading them aloud, I usually tell them that all that Lao-tzu said is just a big yes. But can I live it? For about fifteen minutes a day. Maybe.
So every other semester, I find a way to teach this book. It fits into just about everything. We read, we talk, I remember what I have forgotten that I can't remember, and then we move on to something else.
It's my hope that one year I will open this book, and know that I know the Tao in a way I haven't known it before. But I am not holding my breath. Maybe that means I am expecting results. Damn! Screwed it up again.
Off to the Oakland City Impound lot where I will be content, not judge, and not expect one result.
Jessica
- Login Or register To Post Comments
- Send To A Friend
RSS- Bookmark With:







Ericka Lutz says:
It's an admirable approach,
It's an admirable approach, to teach what you don't know to learn it yourself, and I have no doubt it keeps your teaching fresh and stimulating. I think that each time you open the Tao you DO know it in a way you haven't before. A little at a time. (But then, I know you're not confident in your patience... though I think you have more than you think you do.)
Jessica Barksdale Inclan says:
the question would be--does
the question would be--does anyone really know anything?
Once in graduate school, I was reading a text I've long since forgotten the title of, and we were going over a passage. My teacher had been reading this work for years, and I said something like, "He says he does NOT have it," (whatever it was). The teacher read the line, read the line, read the line, and then looked up at me in awe. He said, "I've been reading that wrong from 35 years."
He thought he had it down, and it truly taught me more than whatever it was we were reading did.
J
Jessica Barksdale Inclan www.jessicabarksdaleinclan.com
Eric Nichols says:
We promise nothing, and, By
We promise nothing, and, By Golly, We deliver!
In all seriousness, though....you need to read this article:
http://www.paulgraham.com/goodart.html
I think you'll see the relevance to your dilemma. We will discuss!
Blesssings,
Eric
Jessica Barksdale Inclan says:
I think saying "I like
I think saying "I like something" is okay. Good or bad are difficult because it's all about what I think good and bad are.
I do think that taste is subjective, though, the good or badness of things come from the viewer. And I don't think that's a bad thing.
So an interesting article, certainly.
What I do feel I'm talking more about here is that something like the Tao is almost unknowable!
J
Jessica Barksdale Inclan www.jessicabarksdaleinclan.com
Eric Nichols says:
Hi Again: Here's another
Hi Again:
Here's another (actually previous) essay by Paul:
http://www.paulgraham.com/taste.html
I think you'll agree after reading this that taste is not as subjective as you might think. It only seems that way, because most things we apply the concept of "taste" to are not life and death situations. But when you're building a plane or a skyscraper, it becomes much more crucial....and objective. Truth becomes a lot more absolute!
Eric
Belle Yang says:
Hi, J
What edition of the Dao De Jing do you use?
And what are the students reaction to the teachings? Is this in Critical Thinking?
Jessica Barksdale Inclan says:
This is the Stephen Mitchell
translation. The students really like it. Always. The ones who complain say, "It's all true, but how can anyone live like that?"
But no one disagrees, ever. I've "taught" this in mythology, critical thinking, and freshman comp. Never a dull moment!
J
Jessica Barksdale Inclan www.jessicabarksdaleinclan.com
sonshi (not verified) says:
Teaching the Tao in a classroom
is like teaching people how to ride a bike in a classroom.
That's why Lao Tzu starts off his book by saying that you cannot gain the knowledge of what the Tao is through words alone. You must first feel it and you must first experience it.
And that is why you often hear people say things like "The sunset was so beautiful words cannot describe it." If you saw that sunset yourself, you'd know. But if you haven't, good luck trying to fully visualize what they're describing to you.
Matthew Biberman says:
Tao/Lear/Thanks/Redemption
Nice post and discussion. I am eager to read what you think of Lear.
Jessica Barksdale Inclan says:
Me, too
I'm into it a bit, and somehow irritated with Shakespeare. He seems so obvious right now! Yikes!
J
Jessica Barksdale Inclan www.jessicabarksdaleinclan.com