What is smart?
I have a friend who’s a sales manager for a technology company. They have a small staff that designs technologically complex products that only geeks understand. But those products get sold to ordinary humans – small business owners mostly – so they have her to sell them.
She says, “They’re all smarter than me!”
They say, “She’s kind of slow.”
I guess you can be a top sales person even if you're slow.
I have another friend who coaches college basketball. He says, “Some of these kids are really talented. We may even make the tournament this season!”
But you’ve all heard what some of the other college people say, “They’re dumb jocks. It’s the science guys who are smart!”
Conversations like that lead me to wonder . . . what attributes does one need in our society to be called smart?
If you have an exceptional command of language, and you’re a gifted speaker, people will listen and say . . . “You know, that fellow is really smart!”
If your mathematical abilities far exceed the abilities of those around you, they will say, “What a geek! But he’s smart.” They’ll also say that if you have an aptitude for computer programming, electronics, particle physics, or biology.
In Western society, those are the attributes that get you called smart.
Aren’t we missing something here? I’ve been hanging around with neuroscientists for a while now, on this TMS project, and I’ve gotten a better understanding of what smart means, and the truth is quite different from the popular perception. This is how most people define smart in America: A smart person is someone who has remarkable command of language, or above average speaking ability, or really exceptional and cerebral mathematical, engineering, or scientific ability.
There is a fundamental flaw in that thinking, which I’ll begin to illustrate by a few attributes that do not get you called smart in our society.
A biologist who works to develop a vaccine is smart. The person who knows how to see into the mind of a frightened animal to soothe it and administer the vaccine isn't smart, though. He's just kind of strange, talking to animals like that.
Artists are not generally described as smart, despite the fact that their creations come entirely from the mind. Photographers are not smart, either, and they’re actually dismissed entirely with the comment, “If I spent $10,000 on a camera like yours, I’m sure my pictures would be just as good as yours!”
The top real estate salesperson in your city isn’t smart either. She’s just good looking, or she has a great ability to schmooze people and she’s pushy.
The financial analyst who makes millions by finding and betting on subtle patterns in the securities market isn’t smart. He’s greedy and avaricious.
And we can’t forget book authors. They aren’t generally described as smart either, because after all . . . we just write down what happened. Anyone can do that.
And popular musicians must be dumb . . . just look at the stuff they do. It’s in People and EW every week!
The most amazing thing is . . . every one of these kids was above average, and really bright and cute and funny as a kid. How do I know? Just look at today's toddlers, and talk to their parents.
With all the bragging I have seen and heard from parents, I have yet to hear . . . He's a wonderful boy, and just a little bit subnormal! Nope, I've never heard that boast, and I doubt if you have, either.
Maybe intelligence diminshes with age or the people who aren't related to you are just dumber.
So what wisdom can we draw from that?
Every one of those things is really a kind of smart. For each of those people, it is brain power that makes them the successes they are. The brain is what gives Larry Bird or Michael Jordan the coordination to be the best in the world. It’s the brain that gives the real estate champ the emotional intelligence to connect with all those people and make a favorable impression. And it’s raw mathematical insight – reasoning power - that makes the stock analyst a success. All different kinds of brainpower.
You could almost say . . . if it’s esoteric or entertaining, we’ll call it smart. But if it makes millions, or wins public acclaim, it’s something less.
This definition of smart is really worth thinking about. Everything we do is controlled by the brain. Countless brain parts, controlling countless functions. Even something as basic as our digestion may be “smart.”
You and I may have exactly the same guts. But you can’t tolerate milk, and I can. You get sick all the time, and I don’t. Why? Perhaps the part of the brain that runs the intestines is smarter in me than it is in you. I know . . . that sounds nutty. But science is proving it true.
So what kinds of smart do you see in the people around you?
Can a person be smart in one way and not others? Certainly . . . that, in essence, is what autism is about. What will happen if we learn to rebalance or change these different intelligences?
- Login Or register To Post Comments
- Send To A Friend
RSS- Bookmark With:







Belle Yang says:
Hi, I read Jill Bolte Taylor's
"A Stroke of Insight" and have been redefining smart. This is a terrific essay. Thank you.
Belle
Dennis Shay says:
Consensus believes "intelligence" is multifaceted.
John, I realize your blog is on "preceived" intelligence by onlookers as they appraise their fellow humans. Agreed, various human abilities garner more social respect. But science avoids assigning a single number in quantitating "intelligence" in ourselves.
The following table lists the eight intelligences identified by Howard Gardner. It provides some examples of the types of professionals who exhibit a high level of an intelligence. The eight intelligences are listed in alphabetical order.
Intelligence
Examples
Discussion
Bodily-kinesthetic
Dancers, athletes, surgeons, crafts people
The ability to use one's physical body well.
Interpersonal
Sales people, teachers, clinicians, politicians, religious leaders
The ability to sense other's feelings and be in tune with others.
Intrapersonal
People who have good insight into themselves and make effective use of their other intelligences
Self-awareness. The ability to know your own body and mind.
Linguistic
Poets, writers, orators, communicators
The ability to communicate well, perhaps both orally and in writing, perhaps in several languages.
Logical-mathematical
Mathematicians, logicians
The ability to learn higher mathematics. The ability to handle complex logical arguments.
Musical
Musicians, composers
The ability to learn, perform, and compose music.
Naturalistic
Biologists, naturalists
The ability to understand different species, recognize patterns in nature, classify natural objects.
Spatial
Sailors navigating without modern navigational aids, surgeons, sculptors, painters
The ability to know where you are relative to fixed locations. The ability to accomplish tasks requiring three-dimensional visualization and placement of your hands or other parts of your body.
Perkins (1995) examines a large number of research studies both on the measurement of IQ and of programs of study designed to increase IQ. He presents detailed arguments that IQ has three major components or dimensions.
Keiko Amano says:
Smart
I’m glad to see dance in the smart list. I wish I were aware of it in college. I was a dance major long ago, but I went into systems programming instead. I think we all should write novels about what we mean by smart. And we should definitely keep up looking for other aspects when people boast their smart.
On milk, I envy those people who are able to drink milk. I used to drink milk, but I had to switch to soy milk a few years ago. Now I like soy milk. Can you drink soy milk?
Brian McKee says:
Asperger Syndrome and the Overrating of Intelligence
Hi. I really like your article.
My Nephew has Asperger Syndrome http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome
From what I can tell from this "condition" and others like it, for every ability we lose, we gain something somewhere else. My Nephew is brilliant at math and music, but he doesn't understand (or at least didn't understand, I believe he's learned a lot) how to interact in healthy ways with others. I think that's because he doesn't naturally connect with people as well as he does with concepts. Perhaps that's his trade off: conceptual understanding boosted while interpersonal empathy diminished.
As a guy who seeks peace, I've come to the conclusion that intelligence is overrated. Have you ever met someone with below average intelligence? You'll never meet a more contented individual. Oh how I envy that. I believe that we must rise above our intelligence and connect at the intuitive level to achieve true peace. The larger our intelligence, the higher the climb.
I'm not saying its not worth it. I'm also not saying that it doesn't have any benefit. I'm just saying its a whole lot easier when there's not a giant intellect to overcome.
Thanks again for such an interesting and thoughtful article.
Brian