Am I a Liar?
Journal to describe yourself and your life now. Birthday, graduation, self-discovery gift.
Amazon.com
Barnes & Noble
Powell's Books
I was searching my digital photo files for yet another online profile. It had to be fairly close up, with no hands on my shoulder from a cropped-out friend, and it had to look like me. Not easy. I finally found the photo I used for Red Room. I was surprised to see that it was taken in 2004. How time flies.
Does using a photo from 2004 make me a liar? How old can a photo be before it is a lie?
I rather like this photo - it reminds me of the lazy Sunday morning when my daughter snuck up on me and took it. I was halfway through the funnies, well before my shower, and her bedhead made me laugh. I'm usually the one who takes sneak attack photos, so she was especially pleased with herself for catching me.
And yet, I don't want to be a liar. I never want to be the old woman with airbrushed "star" photos that make her look thirty years younger. I've got no problem with my wrinkles. I earned them. Nor do I want people who eventually do meet me to think, "Holy hell, she's ancient in real life. Does she not like being ancient? Does she not want people to know?"
I will not lose sleep over this. If I do, you may see a new photo of me, probably with some finger tips on my shoulder from a friend (who will be mad s/he was cropped out), or with one of my shoulders elevated and tipped toward the lense (self-portrait). If not, I will forever be here, smiling at my daughter's 2004 bedhead.
- Login Or register To Post Comments
- Send To A Friend



Randy Susan Meyers says:
Just thought about this
Just thought about this today. Author pic taken 7 months ago. Really like it. How long do I get to use it. Oh, what is the 'sell by' date?
Dale Estey says:
Wotz a few years, give or
Wotz a few years, give or take? Now, if we're talking a baker's dozen, I'd say a li(n)e has been crossed.
Hairbrush, not air brush, say I.
David Marshall says:
Update Photo on Social Networks
I think mine is three or four years old, too, when Wayne took our photo up on the Ridge. Maybe it's time to change it also. But I can attest that my wife Kate still looks as MAAAAARVOLOUS as ever, just like in her Red Room picture!
Wendy McNally says:
I take the cake on this one!
My RRphoto dates back to 1994, but I've been told on many occasions that I look the same today. So I figure, why update the photo?
Maybe in ten or twenty years, I'll have a new photo around, of the old me.
Kate Marshall says:
about even
Today I'm looking at my photo here and thinking, "Oh for Pete's sake, run a comb through your hair already. And you might try some lipstick for once!" So maybe my disheveled early morning state in the photo balances out the fact that it's a few years old. Maybe.
Ryoma Collia-Suzuki says:
We love this profile pic,
We love this profile pic, Kate. On the matter of age of a picture before it needs changing, I think it is more about the picture itself. One of my favourite author pics is of Jack Hillier, Gina's mentor. The photo was taken by his wife, Mary. It is timeless, completely and utterly timeless. Even 20 years later it is completely representative of him as he was throughout the 80s and 90s.
Another author profile photo I have seen recently is fairly recent and has already aged terribly. It's a studio shot, the author has had a makeover and also taken the trouble to get 'dressed up'. It is awful. It looks like it was taken in the 80s by an amateur and is not becoming of the author at all, especially as normal photos of this person have been used occasionally and they look fabulous.
Your profile is like Mr Hillier's, imho. It is so natural, friendly and, I'll say the word again, timeless. But hey, that's just me speaking. :)