Ain't She a Woman?
So, I'm just wondering...
Ain't Michelle Obama a woman?
The reason I ask is this: During the Presidential primaries, there were numerous examples of sexist media commentary aimed at Hillary Clinton, from comments on her cleavage, to her pantsuits, to her laugh (described as a "cackle") to her voice sounding like "the voice every husband knows" when being asked to take out the trash. Messed up stuff for sure. And white women, by and large, rushed to her defense, angrily (and correctly) denouncing the misogyny that was so commonly on display these past few months.
And yet, as Michelle Obama has come under fire (much of it also blatantly sexist in nature) these white women, many of them self-proclaimed feminists, have said virtually nothing. So when commentators have called her aggressive, or "angry," or "hard-edged" (just a few of the words I've heard used to describe her)--and indeed, these are sexist in nature because they imply that women should be passive, sweet and soft, almost as an achetype--white women by and large say nothing in her defense. And worst of all, when FOX News recently displayed their infamous on-screen caption about Michelle Obama, describing her as "Obama's Baby Mama," there was little if any outcry from nationally prominent white women and/or feminists, including the ones who were so animated in their defense of Hillary Clinton.
Where is the New York state chapter of NOW, whose leader Marcia Pappas absurdly and grotesquely compared Obama and John Edwards's treatment of Clinton during the primary debates to a "gang-bang?" Why no words of feminist outrage for the black woman, being attacked by white men? Hmmm...inquiring minds want to know.
Ain't she a woman (to borrow from Sojourner Truth)?
Or do black women scare white feminists, just as much in 2008 as they did in Truth's day, by challenging the way in which womanhood has been racially-constructed as white, and white women typified as the prototypical woman, the norm, the ideal, the standard?
To continue the thought I was trying to begin with the Open Letter to white women who, despite being progressive, are threatening to vote for McCain...once again, their whiteness is showing.
- Login Or register To Post Comments
- Send To A Friend
RSS- Bookmark With:







Jessica Barksdale Inclan says:
Some thoughts not mine
Try: http://www.newsweek.com/id/141491
And: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/06/18/MNS211BBRL.DTL&tsp=1
J
Jessica Barksdale Inclan www.jessicabarksdaleinclan.com
Jennifer Gibbons says:
I don't think any First Lady has gotten off easy...
when Eleanor Roosvelt was First Lady, she was critqued for being too dumpy. Jackie Kennedy for spending money, etc.
However, is it necessary? Of course not. In fact, Whoopi Goldberg showed the clip where Michelle Obama allegedly said she was, for the first time, proud to be an American. Apparently the media left out the part where she said "really proud" to be an American. Gee guys, don't do anything like leave a word out...
Eric Bogan says:
Quindlan pretty much
Quindlan pretty much confirms Tim's comments on how white womenhood is the norm. Notice how she reduces Obama's support to 'young and African-Americans', no mention of older or younger black women supporters. Quindlan's argument re Hillary supporters voting for McCain is weak at best.
Jessica Barksdale Inclan says:
But that's why I included the sf chron column!
There is a different idea on every front!
J
Jessica Barksdale Inclan www.jessicabarksdaleinclan.com
Eric Bogan says:
Fair enough. There were
Fair enough. There were comments from both sets of supporters that if their candidate lost, they would support McCain, yet the Clinton supporters were the most vociferous in their insistence that they would vote for McCain.
Frederic Christie says:
It Doesn't Matter, Anyways
In any respect, it just won't do to point to the other side and say "They did it first!" Maybe some Obama supporters insisted they would vote for McCain, though I saw fairly few personally (I did see it but I really doubted the sincerity of the threat). But I'd argue there is something just a BIT different going on there. With Obama, there was not only the racial element as Clinton had the gender element, but there is also a progressivism to lots of his supporters. Unfortunately, Obama the candidate and Obama the man is far from their vaunted perceptions, but in any respect some of these folks threatening to vote for McCain I think were arguing from their PROGRESSIVISM, not out of sexist fear of Hillary. They were thinking that Hillary would just be more old school party politics.
That having been said, any such vote would be inexcusable and stupid. But that's not my point. To say, "The other side did it" is moot to Tim's point about why HILLARY's "feminist" supporters argued as such. Maybe it'd be interesting to similarly analyze the reasons on Obama's side, but Tim made his Hillary point compellingly.